Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Aftermath
First spill trial witness: BP put cost cuts over safety
(Planet Ark) BP Plc fostered a culture that put cost-cutting over safety before the deadly 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill, a noted forensic engineer said in the first day of testimony in the federal civil trial centered on the disaster.
“There is ample evidence of intense pressure within the system to save time and money,” said Bob Bea, co-founder of the Center for Catastrophic Risk Management at the University of California, Berkeley. “With stress and pressure come sacrifices to safety.”
Bea was the first witness for the plaintiffs, the U.S. Justice Department and U.S. Gulf Coast states suing Macondo well owner BP, rig owner Transocean Ltd and well cement provider Halliburton Co.
The plaintiffs plan to call Lamar McKay, chairman and president of BP America, to testify as a hostile witness once Bea wraps up. McKay is a member of the London-based oil company’s executive committee, alongside Chief Executive Officer Bob Dudley.
BP settlement not the final word in spill story
(CNNMoney) — BP announced Thursday it settled criminal charges with the U.S. government over the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill for $4.5 billion. But that won’t resolve some of the biggest liabilities still facing the company.
Chief among them is the penalty that could come out of the Clean Water Act — a potential civil fine for spilling the oil itself.
If things go the company’s way, that fine could be somewhere between $3.5 billion and $5 billion, said Jason Gammel, an analyst at Maquarie Securities Group in London.
But if BP is found guilty of gross negligence in the spill, the penalty could more than quadruple to roughly $20 billion — dwarfing today’s settlement.
The government has accused BP of gross negligence in the spill. A civil trial is set for February, and could drag on for years.
BBC points out BP launched an internal investigation in the immediate aftermath of the explosion which concluded that no single cause was behind the accident, but “multiple companies, work teams and circumstances were involved over time”.
Other companies involved included Transocean, the owner of the rig and responsible for the safety valve known as the blowout preventer, and Halliburton, who provided cementing services.
BP is yet to reach a settlement with these firms. A civil trial that will determine negligence is due to begin in New Orleans in February 2013.
BP’s Deepwater settlement considered chump change by critics
(LA Times) British oil giant BP is more than prepared for the $4.5 billion in settlement charges it agreed to Thursday, analysts said.
BP agreed to plead guilty to 11 felony counts of misconduct or neglect of ships officers directly related to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion in the Gulf of Mexico that killed 11 workers.
BP also agreed to one misdemeanor count under the Clean Water Act; one misdemeanor count under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act; and one felony count of obstruction of Congress. The deal requires U.S. federal court approval.
In the third quarter alone, BP raked in sales of more than $93 billion and had a net profit of more than $5.2 billion. That was a result that showed that “BP has made the most remarkable comeback from the most costly industrial accident in history,” said Fadel Gheit, senior energy analyst at Oppenheimer and Co., in a note to investors.
Storm Isaac tars Louisiana beaches with oil from BP spill
(Planet Ark) Two years after the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history, mats of oily tar from BP Plc.’s ill-fated Macondo well have turned up on Louisiana’s shore after Hurricane Isaac stirred up submerged oil deposits, BP officials said on Tuesday.
Study: BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill could still be damaging fish
Oil residue from the 2010 BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico could be causing potentially lethal defects in fish, according to a Smith College biologist.
“This oil is not gone yet. This disaster is not over. There are embryos right now that are still getting exposed to that oil,” said Michael J.F. Barresi, who, along with students at Smith College and the University of Massachusetts, conducted a study of the effects of oil residue of the type and in the concentrations that existed in the Gulf after the spill.
An article about the study and their findings appeared in a recent issue of BMC Biology, an online journal. Barresi was the lead investigator.
Aftermath: The Deepwater Horizon, Two Years on
(Bloomberg) More than two years later, the legal aftermath of the accident is taking shape. Just this week federal authorities indicted a BP engineer on obstruction of justice. Separately, a federal judge in New Orleans indicated he was “leaning” toward preliminary approval of a $7.8 billion settlement between BP and private plaintiffs. The U.S. Department of Justice investigation into the spill, and possible Clean Water Act violations related to it, continues.
Deepwater Horizon aftermath: how much is a dolphin worth?
(Guardian)Two years after the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster, BP and US authorities wrangle over how much should be paid in damages
BP oil spill settlement: Justice for 100,000 Gulf Coast victims?
(CSM) The estimated total cost of the settlement will be about $7.8 billion, which makes it one of the largest class-action settlements in US history. The BP oil spill settlement was filed Wednesday.
Two days before the two-year commemoration of the start of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, BP and a committee representing more than 100,000 plaintiffs have agreed on a blueprint to settle billions of dollars in unresolved economic, property, and medical damage claims.
Is the US Gulf oil spill issue truly settled?
British oil giant BP has agreed to compensate thousands of victims but many key issues remain unresolved.
(Al Jazeera) Late last week, the British oil giant BP agreed to pay out an estimated $7.8bn to settle a lawsuit with more than 120,000 victims of the disaster.
A trial to determine blame has been postponed. But settlements will not be universally welcomed around the Gulf. Many still want to see BP, Transocean and Halliburton held to account in court.
And, whatever the outcome some important issues still remain unanswered.
Firstly, the health impact of the chemical dispersants – more than eight million litres – that were used to break up the oil spill is still unknown.
Secondly, there is the environmental damage. While the oil may have visibly cleared from the Gulf, it may be years before ecologists know the full impact of the spill. …
What BP’s settlement entails:
It gives affected individuals and businesses an estimated $7.8bn but that is not the end to BP’s legal woes. The agreement does not include BP’s partners Transocean, which owned the doomed Deepwater Horizon oil rig, or Halliburton, which provided the rig with construction materials. The two companies also face possible criminal and civil penalties with an estimated $65bn in long-term cleanup costs.
Those seeking damages from BP and its partners include their investors, the US federal and state governments, and workers who helped clean up the spill. Also, BP, Halliburton and Transocean are suing each other.
BP asks Halliburton to pay for Gulf of Mexico spill
(BBC) Oil giant BP has asked its contractor Halliburton to pay for all costs and damages that arose from the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
The claims were made in a filing by BP’s lawyer Don Haycraft in a US Federal court.
BP and Halliburton are locked in a legal battle with a trial expected this year to settle damages claims.
BP gulf spill has not dimmed Tony Hayward’s ambition
(The Guardian) Former BP boss is glad to be back in the oil business – this time in Kurdistan – but is not saying what Deepwater Horizon taught him
Halliburton ‘destroyed’ evidence after Gulf oil spill, BP charges
(CSM) BP alleges that Halliburton, a subcontractor working on the Deepwater Horizon rig, destroyed evidence pertaining to what might have caused the explosion that triggered the Gulf oil spill.
The allegation by oil giant BP that Halliburton, a subcontractor on the doomed Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, destroyed data about a cement slurry operation is a glimpse into a nasty corporate court battle set to go to trial in federal court in New Orleans in February.
Analysis: BP oil spill report may prompt $30 billion pay-out
(Reuters) – Findings of the second major investigation by the government into the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill, may press BP into putting over $30 billion on the table to quickly settle its outstanding legal headaches.
The report, released on Wednesday, was even more damning of BP’s behavior than the Presidential panel’s findings, which were issued in January and February. Both reports also highlighted mistakes made by BP’s contractors, driller Transocean and cement specialist Halliburton.
The investigations have not left London-based BP eager to face the Department of Justice or civil claimants in court.
BP oil disaster largely blamed on cement failure
Poor management decisions cited in report
(CBC) A key federal report puts ultimate responsibility on BP for the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history and the deaths of 11 rig workers, especially regarding the cement seal that was put in place the day before the explosion that triggered the spill.
The report, released Wednesday, said in the days leading up to the disaster, BP made a series of decisions that complicated cementing operations, added risk, and may have contributed to the ultimate failure of the cement job.
Other companies also shared some of the blame, according to the report, which noted that rig owner Transocean, as owner of the Deepwater Horizon, was responsible for conducting safe operations and for protecting personnel onboard.
The details were contained in the final report from an investigation team of the U.S. Coast Guard and the agency that regulates offshore drilling. The panel held hearings in the year following the April 20, 2010, Deepwater Horizon tragedy. The Coast Guard-Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Regulation and Enforcement investigation was among the most exhaustive.
Other investigations spread around the blame rather evenly, faulting misreadings of key data, the failure of the blowout preventer to stop the flow of oil to the sea and other shortcomings by executives, engineers and rig crew members. The joint investigation team laid considerable blame on BP’s shoulders.
The report said the decisions included using only one cement barrier and BP’s choice to set the production casing in a location in the Macondo well that created additional risk of influx of oil or gas. The casing is a steel pipe placed in a well to maintain its integrity. … BP, Transocean and cement contractor Halliburton did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Sean Smith — Ink Spill: Inside the Battle to Shape the News Coverage of Last Year’s Oil Gusher
(HuffPost) One year ago on Friday, the runaway oil well in the Gulf of Mexico was capped, ending one of the longest-running and most popular reality news shows in American history. At the time I was the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and one of a small group of people who led the Obama administration’s communications response to the unfolding disaster.
For 85 days, the spill was a viewership blockbuster. Overall coverage of the spill dominated the news and captivated the country. A study done by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism found that the story accounted for 22% of the total news in the 14 weeks following the initial explosion. The networks, ABC, NBC, and CBS, devoted 29% of their evening newscasts to the spill, and CNN dedicated an astonishing 42% of its airtime to the story. And according to the Pew Report, “If the mainstream media gave the Gulf spill a large amount of attention over an unusually long time span, the public, if anything, was even more fascinated.” They found that the public interest in the spill equaled the levels of attention “to some of the grimmest moments of the recent economic crisis and exceeding the interest at the most pivotal moments of the health care debate.”
Scientists see increased Gulf oil spill effects A year after the Deepwater Horizon explosion triggered a massive oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico, scientists are warning the real effects of the spill are now becoming apparent. Dolphins and whales are dying, while red snapper and other fish species are developing lesions on their flesh. The Globe and Mail (Toronto) (4/21)
Deepwater Horizon, One Year Later: A Conversation With Carl Safina
(The Atlantic) At approximately 9:50 P.M. on April 20, 2010, a well ruptured at the Macondo 252 site, three miles under the surface of the Gulf of Mexico and 40 miles southeast of the Louisiana coast. The blowout would kill 11 men, destroy the Deepwater Horizon rig, and, 205.8 million gallons of oil later, constitute the largest accidental marine oil spill in the history of the petroleum industry.
A Sea in Flames: The Deepwater Horizon Oil Blowout is conservationist Carl Safina’s impassioned account of the Deepwater Horizon disaster, a tale of industry mismanagement and environmental catastrophe in a region already facing “death by a thousand cuts”.
Flurry of lawsuits filed on anniversary of Deepwater Horizon explosion continues
(Times-Picayune) The wave of lawsuits filed on the one-year anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon explosion and three-month oil gusher continued into Wednesday evening, with BP filing suit against Transocean for $40 billion and other contractors on the ill-fated well making other claims.
In a statement, BP said its claims against Transocean are consistent with the conclusions reached by the Presidential Commission, which found that Transocean missed critical signs that hydrocarbons were flowing up the riser and failed to take appropriate actions to shut down the Macondo well. “But for Transocean’s improper conduct, errors, omissions, and violations of maritime law, there would not have been any blowout of the exploratory well in Mississippi Canyon, Block 252,” the company said. … Earlier in the day, BP had sued Cameron International, calling its blowout preventer faulty. BP also sued Halliburton, saying that its “misconduct” with the cement job on the well contributed to the blowout.
Lest we forget -
April 20, 2011
Kenneth Feinberg: BP Fund Adminstrator
(CBC- The Current) Last June, BP set aside 20-Billion-dollars as compensation for people whose lives were devastated by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
Now, one year to the day after the blow-out, many of those people want to know why they still haven’t seen the money.
Halliburton sues BP over Deepwater Horizon disaster
… Halliburton says that it contracted with BP Exploration on April 15, 2009, to provide drilling support services in the Gulf of Mexico, including the Macondo oil well, located on the Mississippi Canyon Block 252.
According to the brief, this contract included an indemnity clause which, among other things, released Halliburton Energy Services from all claims, losses, damages, expenses and liabilities arising from blowout, fire, explosion or any uncontrolled well condition resulting in personal injury, wrongful death, pollution and contamination.
BP oil spill: The environmental impact one year on – good map too.
(BBC) … one year on, what environmental impact did one of world’s largest accidental oil spills have on the region’s wildlife and habitats, and has it been as bad as it was feared at the time?
Scientists have warned that it is too soon to attempt to offer a considered assessment on what impact the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the largest of its kind, has had on the Gulf of Mexico’s wildlife.
In short, they said, nature did not work in such a way that the full picture will present itself within just one year.
Counting the cost of the BP disaster one year on
(BBC) A year after the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon the cost of the human and environmental disaster is still being counted.
The Gulf of Mexico’s Seafood Rebirth a Year After the BP Oil Spill
(The Daily Beast) One year after the BP oil disaster, marine life is thriving in the Gulf of Mexico and fishermen and state officials are optimistic about the summer season. But locals still battling health problems are angry at the oil giant’s failure to meet its commitments
Protesters Disrupt BP’s First Shareholder Meeting Since Oil Spill
(ENS News) Shareholders questioned board members about excessive executive pay and a lack of transparency on safety improvements.
Scuffles, protests mar BP shareholder meeting
(AP) … About 7 percent voted against the re-election of chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg, who has been criticized for his soft response to the spill, and just over 11 percent voted against the company’s remuneration report because of bonuses awarded to Iain Conn, BP’s head of refining and Chief Financial Officer Byron Grote for work not related to the oil spill.
Former CEO Tony Hayward also grabbed headlines with a $17.9 million pension, $1.6 million payoff and about $13 million in share options despite a series of public gaffes that led to his ceding the CEO post to Bob Dudley, the first American to head the London-based company.
Pressure on Kenneth Feinberg to disclose BP pay deal
(Reuters) Established to compensate victims of the BP Plc oil disaster, it essentially invests one man with full power over how the money is distributed, while he is being paid by the company and unsupervised by any government body.
Now pressure is intensifying for Feinberg to fully disclose his fee arrangement with BP. But interviews with experts in dispute resolution and legal ethics suggest that Feinberg is under no obligation to unveil anything about his deal with BP — and in fact, in a report released last month, he disclosed more than he had to. A Reuters Legal analysis found that Feinberg is operating in a gray area not governed by rules that typically apply to arbitrators or fund administrators.
Gulf of Mexico oil spill: Panel urges major reforms
(BBC) A major US report into the Gulf of Mexico oil spill has called for wide-ranging reforms of the oil industry to prevent a repeat of the disaster.
The report comes from a US presidential commission investigating the spill.
The panel also said the US needed to expand and update drilling regulation and establish an independent drilling safety agency.