Re The $200 Billion Electric School Bus Bust Chris Goodfellow: Are we thinking rationally? The stunning extra cost to property…
Canada: PM Justin Trudeau
Written by Diana Thebaud Nicholson // April 20, 2019 // Canada // Comments Off on Canada: PM Justin Trudeau
Canada: government & governance 2017
Canada: Liberal Party and Justin Trudeau 2015
Inside Trudeau’s inner circle
The unbelievable popularity of Canada’s Justin Trudeau (October 2016)
System breakdown: How cracks inside Justin Trudeau’s office set the stage for crisis
The Prime Minister’s top aides, Katie Telford and Gerald Butts, had a hand in the government’s biggest files. But as Adam Radwanski and Daniel Leblanc report, the burden of office took a toll, putting Justin Trudeau’s leadership to the test
Prime ministers who want to serve more than a single term usually need to have a strong enough handle on their own political identity, and the dynamics of their government, to adapt to different teams around them. With the era of the co-CEOs now over, Mr. Trudeau will have less of the luxury of being managed – and a little more managing to do himself.
(Globe & Mail) … as well as needing to find his footing again publicly, Mr. Trudeau finds himself under pressure to demonstrate a more hands-on form of leadership.His current and former staff members have found themselves under the microscope because of the SNC-Lavalin saga – which includes the resignations of former attorney-general Jody Wilson-Raybould and fellow senior minister Jane Philpott from cabinet, their ejection from the Liberal caucus, the early retirement of clerk of the Privy Council Michael Wernick, opposition allegations of a cover-up and the Liberal Party’s decline in the polls. But the fallout has brought to the fore questions that have long bubbled beneath the surface about the Prime Minister himself – about how much he has stayed on top of the operations of his own office, cabinet, caucus and government and how comfortable he grew serving as the public face of his government and party while those in his employ sweated the details.
… there also appears to have been a failure to empower people outside Mr. Trudeau’s inner circle, even as his top advisers started to show the strains of the massive burden they were carrying. And Mr. Trudeau seems to have failed to take into account that political staff are supposed to be more replaceable than the leaders they serve – as evidenced by the uncertainty and anxiety many Liberals have about what sort of prime minister he will be without both his co-CEOs behind him.
… At odds with the way he has been sold to Canadians – as someone who is open and empathetic – the Prime Minister has not been as accessible as many members of his caucus wanted. Even members of his cabinet have struggled to get past his top staff to meet directly with him, especially without Ms. Telford or Mr. Butts in the room, and many would have appreciated having him informally reach out to them on occasion.
Justin Trudeau, a Prime Minister of symbols, falls to Earth
By Scott Reid, political analyst and principal at Feschuk.Reid, served as director of communications to prime minister Paul Martin.
(Globe & Mail) …if you consider the unique political space he occupied until only recently – if you acknowledge the symbolism and implied promise that so fundamentally shaped his leadership – then you begin to recognize that mortal was the precise opposite of how many Canadians have regarded our present Prime Minister.
The removal of Jody Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpott from the Liberal caucus – and the messy spectacle of fighting with two of his own valued recruits – has accomplished what three years of governing and many years of opposition attacks could not.
Mr. Trudeau has been remade into a mere mortal, a regular old politician – as someone concerned with the calculations and machinations that no office holder can actually afford to ignore, but which his most ardent admirers somehow imagined he was invulnerable to, at least partly because they had been encouraged in that belief.
This does not mean, as some excitable observers have insisted, that Mr. Trudeau is done. He’s not. But his relationship with voters has been irretrievably altered and, with only a few months before the campaign launches, that fact will reshape the coming election.
The implications for the Prime Minister and his team are particularly profound. Gone are the days of pronouncing from on high and equating his own actions with the uncontested public good. His right of assertion has been surrendered. That’s the bitter price of the past two months. From here on out, he must, like the rest of us, go forth and compete for the right to claim his way as the superior path.
David Frum: Justin Trudeau Falls From Grace
The Canadian prime minister faces a political crisis of his own devising.
(The Atlantic) Canada’s politics are perhaps the least polarized in the Western world. The Liberals successfully appeal to business-minded voters; the Conservatives effectively compete for ethnic minorities. In an unpolarized polity, personality hugely matters. Justin Trudeau marketed himself as a radically different kind of politician: artless, open, transparent, feminist.
For him to be seen browbeating an indigenous woman to protect politically wired insiders from facing the legal consequences of their wrongdoing—the reaction to that, in the words of a cover story in Maclean’s by the high eminence of Canadian political commentary, Paul Wells, is to emblazon him as “The Imposter.”
Jaime Watt: Trudeau’s tough lesson in caucus discipline
… the caucus room is the political version of a locker-room complete with competitive spirit and interlinked fates. It is a place where, to work well, individuals and individual interests must be subordinated to those of the team. But it is also a fragile place that can quickly come apart if individuals decide they are better off on their own than they are together. … And that’s why caucus management, or more bluntly put, the care of feeding of the caucus, is such an essential art.
Now that Trudeau has presumably accepted that caucus management must henceforth be a significant part of his job, the next question is whose management style he might draw from. The Mulroney approach might seem the closest approximation to Sunny Ways; Chretien and Martin, who managed to avoid a public caucus revolt, even amidst a pitched civil war, may too have lessons to absorb.
The prime minister may yet fashion his own approach. He would do well to ensure that between now and the election, his remaining caucus members profess devotion to party, to platform, and to him, the leader.
‘Liberal support just bleeding all over the place’
(Maclean’s) A deep dive into recent Angus Reid data shows Liberal support is moving to the Conservatives, NDP and Green parties—a stampede away, rather than a dash toward any particular tent.
Angus Reid’s most recent survey shows 32 per cent of voters strongly or moderately approve of Trudeau’s performance, while 65 per cent disapprove to some degree. That adds up to a net approval rating of -27 per cent for the prime minister, worse than any other party leader by a significant margin (Singh is next at -15 per cent, though it’s worth noting that among the federal leaders, only the Green party’s Elizabeth May enjoys a positive net approval rating).
Trudeau apologizes to Grassy Narrows protester thanked for ‘donation,’ kicked out of Liberal Party fundraiser
Advocate recorded on video saying northern Ontario First Nation ‘suffering from mercury poisoning’
At this point, the Philpott-Wilson-Raybould end game is obvious — destroy Trudeau: Neil Macdonald
Ex-ministers seen as defenders of democracy rather than politicians — despite a most politician-like attack
Might it simply be that Philpott and Wilson-Raybould are being coy because they want to inflict maximum damage on Trudeau from within his own caucus, which they know is the most effective place to do it? Might they intend to push for a leadership review after this fall’s election, or, even better, before it?
At the very least, Wilson-Raybould and Philpott are now objective allies of the Opposition, and any sensible leader would treat them as such. Jean Chrétien absolutely would. Andrew Scheer too, I’d bet.
Trudeau says he had ‘cordial’ conversation with Jody Wilson-Raybould about SNC-Lavalin, discussed ‘next steps’
The PM signals that Wilson-Raybould and former Treasury Board president Jane Philpott will be allowed to remain in the Liberal caucus
Speaking in Maple Ridge, B.C., Trudeau said the two spoke last Monday.
That day, Michael Wernick, clerk of the Privy Council, announced he would leave his post before the fall election, citing a loss of trust with the opposition parties after Wilson-Raybould accused him of being among a group of top officials that pushed her to help SNC-Lavalin land a kind of plea deal to avoid criminal prosecution.
And the government later announced that former Liberal cabinet minister Anne McLellan would look into whether the job of justice minister and attorney general should be split.
Trudeau said he had a “cordial” conversation with Wilson-Raybould where they discussed “next steps,” but he did not elaborate on what that meant.
If Trudeau takes his own advice, he will take a stand against Quebec’s religious symbols ban: Robyn Urback
(CBC) To repeat Trudeau’s words: “Politicians stand around, and we offer our condolences, and we say nice things in the aftermath. We say that we’ll do better. We say that never again will such hatred be allowed to fester unchallenged. And then, when the flames die down, and the smoke clears, we look the other way.”
The flames may die down and the smoke clear by the time Legault tables his legislation. Trudeau’s message that politicians should not allow hatred to fester unchallenged is a necessary one. Yet his anemic response when the topic came up in October was the moral equivalent of looking the other way. In the aftermath of the New Zealand massacre, we should hope that he finally takes his own advice.
Éric Grenier: Liberals have taken a polling hit over SNC Lavalin – but Trudeau’s taken a bigger one
The prime minister’s personal polling numbers aren’t recovering, but the Liberal Party’s numbers might be
The CBC Poll Tracker, an aggregation of all publicly available polls, has recorded a slip of over four points for the Liberals over the last month, putting the party behind the Conservatives for the first time in nearly a year. But the losses suffered by the party are less significant than those suffered by Trudeau himself on questions relating to his own personal brand, the performance of his government and Canadians’ preferences for prime minister.
The numbers don’t suggest that Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer or NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh have been able to take advantage of Trudeau’s struggles.
While Innovative found Trudeau’s favourable vs. unfavourable score dropped by a net 20 points, the polling firm also found Scheer’s decreased by three points, while Singh’s didn’t change at all. Léger recorded Trudeau’s score on preferred prime minister falling seven points, while Scheer’s dropped by one and Singh’s increased by just one.
Peter Donolo: This is how Justin Trudeau survives the political firestorm surrounding SNC-Lavalin
The Prime Minister and his government need a DPA endgame, and they need to work toward it. Do they plan to invoke it for SNC-Lavalin? If so, they need to socialize the media and public for that eventual decision and its merits – avoiding the fatal mistake they made the first time around, when they slipped the DPA legislation into a federal budget omnibus bill, looking and acting as if they had something to hide. If, indeed, they plan on proceeding down the DPA route at this stage, they need to hang a lantern on it.
On the other hand, if they have decided that the DPA is too politically toxic, they should start making that clear now. The alternative, standing on both sides of the fence, is both painful and unsustainable.
Finally, of course, Mr. Trudeau needs to impel his team through this storm. … That means less explanation (the efforts by the PM and Mr. Butts to provide context over the past few days about the idea of moving Ms. Wilson-Raybould to an Indigenous cabinet portfolio only provoked further outrage from First Nation leaders and advocates), and more mitigation: staff changes, and third party reviews of structures such as the combined role of the minister of justice and attorney-general.
Liberal MP Celina Caesar-Chavannes says she was met with ‘hostility, anger’ in private Trudeau talks
In response to detailed questions from The Globe, Matt Pascuzzo, a spokesman for the Prime Minister’s Office, said, “The Prime Minister has deep respect for Celina Caesar-Chavannes. There’s no question the conversations in February were emotional, but there was absolutely no hostility. As the Prime Minister said yesterday, he is committed to fostering an environment where ministers, caucus, and staff feel comfortable approaching him when they have concerns or disagreements – that happened here.”
This is the best he could do?
Trudeau admits ‘erosion of trust’ during SNC-Lavalin affair but does not apologize
(Global) Prime Minister Justin Trudeau offered no apology for the allegations of attempted interference by himself and his staff made by former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould.
While he said he “takes responsibility” for what he describes as an “erosion of trust” between Wilson-Raybould and his team, he made no acknowledgement of whether the discussions that appear to have led to that erosion were inappropriate.
Justin Trudeau’s sorry non-apology
Anne Kingston: When pressed to be personally accountable, the PM has a tendency to transform things into a ‘teaching’ moment. It did not work today.
Bloomberg: Canada’s golden boy stumbles
Justin Trudeau lost another minister, and now the survival of the Canadian leader — who once enjoyed near rock-star status — may hinge on whether she’s the last.
The resignation yesterday of Jane Philpott, a star minister at the Treasury Board, was the second high-profile woman to quit the cabinet over a raging ethics controversy. The departures are devastating for Trudeau and his brand, built in part on gender inclusivity.
The scandal was sparked by his one-time attorney general, Jody Wilson-Raybould, who says he and key aides pressured her to end the prosecution of the construction firm SNC-Lavalin Group on corruption charges. She didn’t, was later shuffled into a different post and then quit. Trudeau says he was just trying to save jobs at the company.
As he joined other key ministers in a climate rally in Toronto, Trudeau thanked Philpott but said his Liberals must stay the course and that voters “need our total commitment to tackling the big things and getting them right.”
Trudeau led the Liberals from third place to victory four years ago. But with his party’s poll numbers dropping and a sluggish economy ahead of elections in October, his future depends on whether his lawmakers still see him as their best bet for a repeat. – Josh Wingrove
Trudeau Promised a Fresh Approach to Politics. Now He’s Embroiled in Scandal.
(NYT) Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada promised a fresh approach to politics, one that was based on openness, decency and liberalism.
Now he is embroiled in a scandal involving accusations of back-room deal-making and bullying tactics, all to support a Canadian company accused of bribing the Libyan government when it was run by the dictator Muammar el-Qaddafi.
Canadian newspapers are filled with outrage and opposition parties are calling for a resignation. Elections are still seven months away, but some members of Mr. Trudeau’s own governing party fear the scandal has armed opposition parties with rich campaign fodder against its leader, who promised “sunny ways” in politics.
“People who are predicting the demise of Justin Trudeau or the Liberals are not making safe bets,” said Emmett Macfarlane, a professor of political science at the University of Waterloo. Much depends on what happens over the next few months and whether the prime minister’s office is able to ward off a full-blown public inquiry into the scandal.
Canada’s Boy Wonder Prime Minister Keeps Tripping Over Himself
The shine is coming off Justin Trudeau with elections looming in 2019
By Josh Wingrove
(Bloomberg) Roughly a year after he was elected, polling data showed that more than half of Canadians were happy with their choice, a major achievement in the country’s multiparty system. Now, barely a third say so. His party’s popularity has slid almost 10 percentage points since 2016, to 37.4 percent, according to a polling aggregator run by the Canadian Broadcasting Corp.
Trudeau does have a few things going for him. He’s cut middle-class taxes, expanded parental benefits, and enacted national pension reform. Pot legalization, which went into effect last October, has gone mostly smoothly, and the country’s first federal carbon tax takes full effect in April. The economy is strong, and at 5.8 percent, unemployment is near a four-decade low. Plus, Canadian voters have historically given prime ministers at least two terms.
How he weathers the Wilson-Raybould scandal may set the tone for the preelection season. But his majority—and potentially his job—may depend on voters’ willingness to tolerate what they don’t like about him in favor of what they do.
John Ibbitson: Brand Trudeau is not what it used to be
Justin Trudeau’s brand in the chill winter of 2019 is not what it was in the sunny autumn of 2015. The stumbles in India and in relations with China. An uncontrolled flow of refugee claimants crossing the border. Pipelines. The carbon tax. Deficits. The failure at electoral reform.
The 2019 election is shaping up to be a referendum on Justin Trudeau’s leadership, which is odd.
After only a few years in power, the Prime Minister should not be such a polarizing figure that this fall’s vote is All About Him. Stephen Harper successfully skated through three elections before he was faced with a referendum on his leadership in 2015, which he lost.
Jean Chrétien never had to fight an election on his leadership – it was always about the other guys. Brian Mulroney got out of the game rather than confront a referendum election.
But the Liberal Party has become so synonymous with Brand Trudeau that deciding whether the Prime Minister deserves four more years will be the inevitable question on Oct. 21.
Opposition leaders have had no success trying to define Mr. Trudeau in their terms, said Lori Turnbull, a political scientist at Dalhousie University, because “he already has his own brand. He was branded the day he was born.” But “that doesn’t mean the brand will keep selling, if people are associating it with things they don’t like.”
“We have lots of studies that show voters evaluate leaders’ personality traits” and that these evaluations powerfully affect their voting choice, said Emmanuelle Richez, who teaches political science at the University of Windsor. “It’s not only about partisanship and socio-demographic background or political issues,” she said. “Leadership does matter.”
MacDougall: ‘Sunny ways’ PM has turned into Trudeau the Divider
Pick almost any issue, and Trudeau and his conscripts are digging a trench between the government position and that of the opposition.
That’s how adversaries of Terri-Lynne McClintic’s transfer to a healing lodge to serve the remainder of her sentence for the savage murder of Tori Stafford became “ambulance-chasing politicians.”
It’s how supporters of ending “birth tourism” became proponents of a “deeply wrong and disturbing idea,” even though most advanced Western democracies put similar limits around their citizenship.
It’s also how Ontario minister Lisa MacLeod became “not Canadian” for asking the feds to stump for the cost of housing migrants making illegal crossings into Canada, and how opponents of the Trudeau carbon tax are a “piece of s—” or “climate-change denier,” depending on the mood of the day.
Given that the government has now reversed itself on healing lodges, is studying birth tourism now that figures show it to be a bigger problem than advertised, and received an Auditor General’s report showing their rose-coloured version of the border crossers is actually an expensive shade of grey, you would think humility would be in order. Sadly, this government is too wedded to the culture war to ever change.
Reject Mohammed bin Salman — or get used to shaking hands with the devil
By Michael Harris
No matter what words a politician uses to pass as a human rights advocate, there is only one test: what they do when faced with difficult choices. So far, the prime minister has been underwhelming.
(iPolitics) Trudeau has at least raised the possibility of cancelling the arms deal between Canada and the “Bone Saw Kingdom.”
The Liberals inherited that $15-billion deal from the Conservatives, who saw nothing wrong with selling weapons to the most repressive regime on Earth. In fact, former PM Stephen Harper promised the Saudis in a letter that he would keep details of the contract secret. … The spin surrounding the arms deal left the impression that Canada was selling Jeeps to the Saudis. In fact, as Murray Brewster reported for the CBC, the deal included heavy assault vehicles, as well as a deeply embedded maintenance and training deal between the two countries that would place Canadian technicians on the ground in Riyadh.
Had Trudeau exercised more mature judgment coming into office, he would have walked away from Harper’s poisoned chalice — the same way he should have walked away from the disastrous Trans Mountain pipeline fiasco.
But having raised the possibility of cancelling export permits for Canadian armoured vehicles headed for Prince Salman’s bloody dictatorship (absolute monarchy is the euphemism), Trudeau is now complaining how difficult it would be to pull the plug on the sale. He’s even talking about how frustrated he is.
On the environment, he offered real change in Paris, and delivered real disappointment in Canada. On electoral reform, Trudeau waxed eloquent and then blamed other parties for his embrace of the status quo. On open government, he promised access to ministers’ offices under freedom of information, then slammed the informational door.
And yes, these perceived shortcomings may not be as cut and dry as they seem. It could be argued, for example, that Trudeau is not Capt. Carbon (pipelines and all), just a politician trying to make a profound transition fraught with obstacles.
It could be argued that he will get around to electoral reform, just not on the schedule that was promised.
But human rights is one of those non-negotiable items. It is not primarily a political matter. It is a matter of values. No matter what words a politician uses to pass as a human rights advocate, there is only one test: what they do when faced with difficult choices. So far, Trudeau has been underwhelming.
Luck is nearly impossible to beat, and Justin Trudeau’s has no end: Neil Macdonald
Who could ask for a more politically convenient American president? Or a more convenient Ontario premier?
Because we need a horse race, (and because we are so deeply in love with clichés), news organizations have been pushing the idea that the bloom is off the Trudeau rose, which of course is doubly clever, given that flower’s famous place on the lapel of our prime minister’s father.
The corollary is obvious: that the next election, which is one year away, will be competitive and exciting, and that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau might just be a one-term wonder.
Well, competitive would be satisfying. Trudeau’s treacly moralizing is tiresome, and so is the smilingly vapid message track his ministers unswervingly follow. I’ve covered Canadian politics off and on since 1979, and I’ve never seen such centrally co-ordinated emptiness.
That said, my guess is that Trudeau spent his summer vacation up on the roof of Rideau Cottage with his wife, staring at the night sky, watching the stars align perfectly.
Trudeau: Canada and U.S. most successful alliance ‘in the history of the modern world’ (video)
In an exclusive interview with Meet the Press, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau tells Chuck Todd that President Trump’s attitude toward longtime ally, Canada, is “insulting.”
Chantal Hébert: A defining week for Justin Trudeau
By any measure, the past week will go down as the defining one in Justin Trudeau’s current term of office.
With back-to-back make-or-break decisions on the pipeline and the trade files, the prime minister is rewriting the terms of engagement on two crucial battlefronts for his government, but also for Canada.
Back in the 2015 campaign, Trudeau offered himself to Canadians as a climate-change champion. On Tuesday, his government announced it was purchasing a pipeline in a dogged attempt to bring more Alberta bitumen oil to the Pacific coast.
Then on Thursday, the prime minister traded his so-called sunny ways for fighting words vis-à-vis the United States, ordering more than $16 billion worth of tariffs on U.S. products in the process.
At the time of his election victory no one, including Trudeau himself, could have predicted that there would come a week when he would nationalize a pipeline and engage in a tit-for-tat tariff battle with Canada’s largest trading partner.
Voters will have to decide next year if they are comfortable with the grown-up version of the political leader they invested with a majority government in 2015. But whether Trudeau remains at the helm or not after the next election, the consequences of the two calls he made this week will outlast the current Parliament.
Liberals return to Ottawa after weekend retreat
The governing Liberals return to Ottawa today fired up after their weekend convention in Halifax. The gathering of Liberals from across the country saw a strong endorsement of progressive policies that encroach on the NDP’s territory, including a call for universal pharmacare and the decriminalization of drug possession for small amounts. (Prime Minister Justin Trudeau welcomed the former and shot down the latter.)
Trudeau fires up Liberals with stinging attacks against Conservatives
(Globe & Mail) Mr. Trudeau defended his government’s record with 18 months to go before the general election, while starting to make arguments for another mandate on Oct. 21, 2019. In particular, Mr. Trudeau got a standing ovation for talking about the arrival of tens of thousands of Syrian refugees after the 2015 general election.
As part of his pitch to Liberal supporters and the voting public, Mr. Trudeau argued Mr. Scheer and the Conservatives are intent on pursuing the policies of former prime minister Stephen Harper if they win the next election. …
Canadians’ love affair with Justin Trudeau is over
(WaPost) After showing a steady lead in public opinion surveys for more than two years after his surprise October 2015 election victory, Trudeau appears to be politically vulnerable. And that’s despite a buoyant economy, what’s seen as a steady hand in NAFTA trade talks with President Trump, and a weak political opposition.”
CBC’s Poll Tracker, which aggregates and weights the results of a dozen opinion surveys, reported in late March that the opposition Conservative Party is now in the lead, at 37.7 percent of voting intentions, compared with Trudeau’s Liberals, at 33.7 percent. The left-of-center New Democratic Party was third at 18.5 percent. Some observers say it’s just a question of midterm blues, with a Canadian election not scheduled until the fall of 2019. But the real culprit seems to have been Trudeau’s visit to India in February.
For critics such as columnist Andrew Coyne of the National Post who see Trudeau as charming but an intellectual lightweight, the India trip simply proved their outlook. “The little things that seemed so charming at first, all those dashing gestures and glam photo ops might well come to seem, at first frivolous, then irritating — an impression of unseriousness compounded by a series of bungled foreign-policy excursions of which the India trip was only the last,” Coyne wrote.
Pollster Nik Nanos says what’s striking about Trudeau’s dip in popularity is that it’s completely “self-inflicted.” Both the Conservative and New Democratic parties have new, inexperienced leaders who are making no significant impression on Canadians. In fact, Trudeau still leads by a healthy margin as the preferred choice for prime minister. … Nanos said that something else is going on. There’s a major gender divide when it comes to Trudeau’s support, and it’s only getting more pronounced. Women have always been partial to Trudeau, not just for his movie-star looks but also his progressive social policies and his self-description as a feminist. Nanos said this divide grew more sharply as he continued to push a pro-feminist agenda, with Trudeau having lost about one-third of his male support since 2015.
Michael Harris: Will the real Justin Trudeau please stand up?
(iPolitics) Trudeau’s PMO is sloppy, mistake-prone and increasingly arrogant. They probably believe that their man is unbeatable and maybe they’re right.
But though they might have used the Indian trip to shore up Liberal chances in 24 Canadian ridings with significant South Asian populations, including powerful Sikh communities in Toronto and Vancouver, they did so at a great cost. When the world starts laughing at you in politics, you have already lost something important.
… After Trudeau answers Anderson’s question, he will then have to reply to David Schindler’s. He’s the brilliant scientist, who from 1968 to 1989 directed the world famous Experimental Lakes Area in Ontario. It was ruinously shuttered by the Harper Conservatives and wisely reopened by Ontario and Ottawa. Schindler is currently a professor of ecology at the University of Alberta.
He points out that science was ignored in the Trans Mountain approval. No one knows, for example, how to get bitumen out from under ice should a spill occur in winter months. And if the bitumen enters a major salmon river, Schindler told the CBC, “We will just sit by and helplessly watch it go upstream.”
Trudeau famously promised that his government’s policies would be based on science. Where is the science to back Trans Mountain, or for that matter, the government’s extravagant claims that by expanding the tar sands, they will still somehow bring down emission rates as promised in Paris?
Why Justin Trudeau Is Being Snubbed in India
The Canadian prime minister’s trip could nonetheless help him with a voting bloc he covets.
(The Atlantic) Trudeau has smiled his way through India, however, meeting with business executives, signing billions of dollars worth of business deals, posing for photographs with Bollywood actors, and donning Indian attire befitting his own Indian wedding reception. The Indians, for their part, have denied the Canadian prime minister is being snubbed (one unnamed official went as far as to call it “protocol”). But a snub it is—and the diplomatic brush-off has its roots in an Indian separatist movement from the 1980s and present-day Canadian domestic politics.
Trudeau, in Davos speech, tells global super rich that Canada won’t follow U.S. on tax cuts
(Gobe & Mail) In a keynote speech to the World Economic Forum, Mr. Trudeau called on corporate chief executives to put workers before profits and take major steps to boost the role of women in the work force and tackle sexual harassment.
“Too many corporations have put the pursuit of profit before the well-being of their workers … but that approach won’t cut it any more,” Mr. Trudeau told the elite gathering at the chic ski resort of Davos. “We are in a new age of doing business – you need to give back.”
What Trudeau says his government has achieved in 2017 so far, annotated
From the politics of marijuana, to moving beyond talk on First Nations, big policy challenges remain
(Maclean’s) Let’s take a look at what Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says his Liberal majority government got done in the first half of 2017. The quotes here are from Trudeau’s statement, released this afternoon as MPs headed home for Parliament’s summer break, and the brief comments provide links to stories, columns and expert analysis:
“Between February and June, I signed agreements with the leaders of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, the Assembly of First Nations, and the Métis National Council, establishing a process to advance shared priorities for Inuit, First Nations, and the Métis Nation.”
Agreements are fine, but measurable progress is another matter. Critics like University of Victoria professors Rob Gillezeau and Jeffrey Ansloos point, for example, to the Parliamentary Budget Officer’s analysis that shows the federal government may not have allocated enough money to fulfill the Liberals’ key 2015 election promise to eliminate the gap between federal spending on First Nations students and kids attending provincially funded schools.
“In February, I welcomed the European Parliament’s approval of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the European Union.”
The deal with Europe is an accomplishment, but hardly one the Liberals can claim as all their own. After all, the deal was mainly hammered out by the former Conservative government of Stephen Harper, who finalized an agreement in principal in 2013 and finished negotiations in 2014 …
“In March, Minister [Bill] Morneau tabled one of the most forward-looking budgets in Canada’s history. With its strong focus on innovation and skills, Budget 2017 prepares Canadians for the changing economy and secures Canada’s place as a hub of innovation.”
It’s hard to guess how much Morneau’s second budget might fuel future Canadian prosperity. His long-term funding for innovative “superclusters,” his controversial Canada Infrastructure Bank plan—these and more Budget ’17 measures are decidedly long-term. No wonder Trudeau tends to highlight far more prominently the 2016 budget’s modest middle-bracket tax cut and big parental benefits boost. But can those measures resonate all the way to the 2019 election?
“In April, we introduced a bill to legalize, strictly regulate, and restrict access to cannabis no later than July 2018.”
The legal and social importance of Trudeau’s marijuana policy is huge. But what about the politics of this landmark legislation? Trudeau’s approach is to highlight the get-tough parts, especially making it a separate crime to sell weed to kids. How will Canadian voters compute the Liberal stance? Is it possible to somehow cast legalizing marijuana as a pillar of a stern, law-and-order campaign message?
“On June 6, Minister Freeland outlined a new foreign policy for Canada, and underscored our commitment to a rules-based international order, progressive trade policies, gender equality, and fighting climate change.”
It’s perhaps a stretch to characterize Freeland’s speech to the House, although important, as a whole new foreign policy. In effect, she framed familiar Canadian policies in a dramatic new light: the sudden decline in U.S. leadership on the world stage under President Donald Trump—not that she mentioned his name. Still, Freeland’s rhetoric counterbalanced the Trudeau government’s assiduous courting of Trump’s inner circle.
“Minister [Harjit] Sajjan unveiled Canada’s new defence policy, which establishes a credible, realistic, and funded strategy for our military and, most importantly, will deliver the standard of service and care our women and men in uniform deserve.”
After laying out the plan to buy many new fighter jets, lots of new naval ships, and even drones, the defence minister’s policy can’t be faulted for lacking ambition. It extends to a whole whole new approach to countering threats from space and bolstering cyber security. But the question is about money. Sajjan’s plan calls for an additional $615 million to be spent in 2017-18, ramping up to $2.3 billion more in 2021-23. In other words, the big money will all come after the 2019 election. And politics, played against the state of the economy, has a way of deferring defence priorities.
“Earlier this week, Minister [Ralph] Goodale tabled legislation to create a new National Security and Intelligence Review Agency and introduce changes to Bill C-51, which will strengthen security and better protect Canadians’ rights.”
Writing for Maclean’s, law professors Craig Forcese and Kent Roach called Goodale’s Bill C-59 “the biggest overhaul in Canadian national security since the creation of the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service (CSIS) in 1984.” Forcese and Roach were prominent critics of the Harper-era anti-terrorism law Goodale set out to reform, and they said he “gets a lot of things right.” In other words, Trudeau most seasoned minister let Liberals MPs head out for the summer break on a positive note. (emphasis added)
Trade in the Balance: An Interview With Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada
On Thursday, June 22, Peter Baker, The Times’s chief White House correspondent, and Catherine Porter, our Toronto bureau chief, interviewed Prime Minister Trudeau.
Celine Cooper: Liberals could use a Quebec lieutenant
Traditionally, a Quebec lieutenant is selected by the prime minister or party leader to act as his or her main adviser on issues specific to the province. In fact, many Liberal francophone leaders from Quebec have had lieutenants. Pierre Trudeau worked with Jean Marchand and Marc Lalonde. Jean Chrétien worked with Marcel Massé, Alfonso Gagliano and Martin Cauchon. Under Paul Martin, the late Jean Lapierre held the position. As party leader, Stéphane Dion had Marcel Proulx and Céline Hervieux-Payette.
The reality is that less than two years into their mandate, the Liberals still don’t seem to have a clear agenda for the province. While there has been a noticeable thaw in the tone of Quebec-Canada relations, signs of strain are starting to emerge. The issue of health-care funding is one example. Bombardier’s ongoing requests for financial aid is another. Jean-Marc Fournier, the provincial minister responsible for Canadian relations, recently reminded the federal government that Quebec is a “nation” and should be treated as a partner on matters that impact the province’s interests.
There are also some indications that Trudeau may not have his finger on the linguistic pulse of the province.
Case in point: the town hall meeting in Sherbrooke last week. Trudeau was asked a question in English about underfunding and access to mental health services for English-speaking minority communities in the Eastern Townships. He thanked the woman for her use of one of Canada’s two official languages, then proceeded to answer in French because “we are in Quebec.”
In a topsy-turvy moment, Parti Québécois Leader Jean-François Lisée suggested Trudeau should have responded in English out of “courtesy” for the anglophone community.
WHAT was he thinking?
Justin Trudeau raked over the coals for French answers to English questions
Quebec anglophones are demanding Prime Minister Justin Trudeau apologize for steadfastly refusing to speak English to anglophones during a swing through the Eastern Townships Tuesday evening.
Reports said there were about six questions from anglophone Townshippers that Trudeau answered all in French despite his fluent bilingualism. Social media picked up on the story with many complaints about Trudeau’s behaviour
Dion, a great Canadian, dishonoured by Trudeau
Dismissal of Stéphane Dion reveals the ruthless and calculating politician in Prime Minister Trudeau
(TorStar) … you summarily dismiss a great Canadian who busted a gut fighting for this country’s unity, who bravely took an early lead in advocating the need for a Great Greenshift, who generally served as a model of decency and integrity in our political life, and who was actually performing strongly as foreign minister notwithstanding the poison chalice of the Saudi arms deal handed to him by the PMO.
This is the opposite of treating a person with respect and dignity, regardless of what non-cabinet position may or may not have been offered.
Andrew Cohen: Trudeau’s friendship with the Aga Khan should be celebrated, not hidden
… let’s revisit this: The Prime Minister goes on holiday over New Year’s. His office does not say where. We learn later that he and his family and some unidentified friends were in the Bahamas, guests of the Aga Khan, on his private island. … The harpies alight, accusing Mr. Trudeau of benefiting personally from the largesse of a man who is the founder of a global foundation that receives money from the federal government for its highly praised humanitarian work.
It’s absurd for this reason: The Aga Khan is one of the world’s most respected figures. In 2014, he addressed Parliament, a rare honour; in 2009, he became an honorary citizen of Canada, a rarer honour shared by Nelson Mandela, the Dalai Lama and Raoul Wallenberg. Both honours were conferred by Stephen Harper’s Conservatives.
First, the Prime Minister should not have hidden the invitation; rather, he should have celebrated it. He should have said that he was honoured to accept and that his visit was as much business as pleasure. He should not reimburse the government for the cost of his travel on a government jet – as he has promised – because conferring with a figure of the stature of the Aga Khan, however convivial the circumstances, is what a prime minister does.
For some reason, he chose to hide it and apologize for it and parade down Wellington Street in down-filled sackcloth and ashes. As he praised the late Fidel Castro too much, he has praised the Aga Khan too little. Someone is giving the PM bad advice.
Justin Trudeau’s false Davos dichotomy
After a fracas over his vacation, Justin Trudeau says he will not be going to Davos. But that’s doing Canada a disservice
Rather than an extraordinary once-a-year opportunity to help nurture major Canadian investment deals and link arms with fellow world leaders troubled with the rise of anti-trade and anti-immigrant populism, Justin Trudeau will extend by a few days his previously planned tour to plaster his smile and winter scarf collection across as many small-town newspaper front pages as he can.
… next week will be a showcase of two competing visions of how big international deals get made: either between sips of Brunello di Montalcino in a noisy, chandeliered room, or through a burst of 5:30 a.m. tweets generously sprinkled with exclamation points and all-caps. The foremost practitioner of the latter style—a man whose electoral triumph has been cast as a victory over the Davos ethic—gets inaugurated as U.S. president on the final day of the Jan. 17-20 conference. Donald Trump rattles against populism, global collaboration and the benefits of immigration in a globalized society, the kinds of themes that are the keys to both the Swiss gathering and Trudeau’s agenda. By rejecting Davos, the Prime Minister has passed up a chance to fortify his position as a leading voice for preserving those values, when those values seem most at risk.
The problem with Justin Trudeau’s New Year’s Eve video
Justin Trudeau should remember that what’s good for the party isn’t always best for the country
(Maclean’s) Prime Minister Justin Trudeau seemed to be channelling the Iron Chancellor with his New Year’s Eve video message on Parliament Hill by conflating the interests of Canadians with those of his own party. “Before we leave 2016 behind, I want to thank you,” he said. “Over the last year, we have accomplished a great deal together . . . We cut taxes on middle-class Canadians, and put more money in the pockets of nine out of 10 families . . . we also signed one of the most progressive free trade deals in history.”
Who are “we” in Trudeau’s New Year’s missive? The laundry list of political achievements leaves little doubt Trudeau is referring to the Liberal party, rather than all Canadians collectively. It’s a disappointingly partisan note at a time suited to more generous statements. It’s also reminiscent of Trudeau’s post-election claim that “Canada is back” when he really meant his party was back in power: Canada and the Liberals being one and the same.
Justin Trudeau set to connect with grassroots Canadians on cross-country tour
Campaign-style tour comes as PM embroiled in ‘cash-for-access’ fundraising controversy
The tour may also be intended to reverse the slippage in Trudeau’s popularity over the final months of 2016 as he deflected allegations of unethical fundraising practices over his appearance at multiple events where donors contributed as much as $1,500 to the Liberal party in order to rub shoulders with the prime minister.
It will also feed into consultations leading up to his government’s second budget, likely to be introduced in February or March.
Trudeau, facing domestic pressures, scraps Davos trip
Forget free trade, pipelines and carbon prices: Liberal fundraising flak the talk of the fall
(CBC) In a season of weighty matters and potentially profound decisions — a pipeline to the West Coast, a price on carbon, the vague possibility of a new electoral system — there has been the constant, nagging hum of ethical concern.
Over the past 34 question periods, opposition has failed to ask about fundraising only six times.
o recap: Liberal ministers, including the prime minister, have been participating in fundraisers at which relatively small groups of people pay up to $1,500 to enjoy the company of a member of cabinet.
Critics find these Liberal events difficult to square with the policy in the prime minister’s own guide for ministers that says, “There should be no preferential access to government, or appearance of preferential access, accorded to individuals or organizations because they have made financial contributions to politicians and political parties.”
Justin Trudeau boxed himself in on more than just pipelines: Chris Hall
Prime minister has little wiggle room on fighter jets, electoral reform and peacekeeping
(CBC) The prime minister had to approve the proposed expansion of Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline because of the many statements he’d made over the past year that boil down to this: protecting the environment can go hand in hand with finding foreign markets for Canadian oil.
“One of the fundamental responsibilities of any prime minister is to get our resources to market,” he said on more than one occasion dating back to the 2015 election campaign.
Whether his government made the right decision on Tuesday will be debated in the days, weeks and even years ahead.
“Voters rejected the old thinking that what is good for the economy is bad for the environment,” he said again Tuesday in announcing his government was giving the okey-dokey to the Trans Mountain project that would add a second pipe to the existing route from Edmonton to Burnaby, B.C.
Keith Beardsley: Storm Clouds Are On The Horizon For The Trudeau Government
(HuffPost) There are plenty of storm clouds on the horizon for the Trudeau government. There are issues requiring tough decisions that a few selfies will not provide him with enough cover nor will they help him to change the channel to better issues or allow for better optics.
His recent foot in mouth moment over his comments on Fidel Castro is just this past weekend’s storm cloud. We also have other storm clouds developing on the horizon:
• Political donations and Trudeau’s “cash for access”
• Decisions to be made on three pipeline proposals
• Buying more CF-18s when the head of the air force says it is not necessary
• Gag orders around the CF-18 purchase
• UN peace-keeping missions
• Our combat role against ISIL
• Climate change negotiations with the provinces
• Health care negotiations with the provinces
• Electoral reform
• Lack of action and funding on First Nations issues
• How to deal with the new administration in Washington
• The foolish comment about being willing to open up NAFTA
• The unraveling of trade talks
• The spiraling out of control debt, which eventually will have to be paid off by taxpayers including the middle class that Trudeau claims to be wanting to help
• The economy also remains the number one issue of concern for Canadians.
Trudeau names Newfoundland’s Malcolm Rowe as Supreme Court nominee
(Globe & Mail) A judge who says the role of the Supreme Court is to create new law, not just apply existing principles, is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s first nominee to the country’s highest court.
For the first time in the court’s 141-year history, qualified individuals were invited to submit applications. Mr. Trudeau created a committee headed by former Progressive Conservative prime minister Kim Campbell to develop a short list for him. The lead-up to the nomination was unusually controversial, as Mr. Trudeau allowed applications from across Canada, raising the prospect that for the first time, Atlantic Canada would not have a judge on the court. …
The new process allows Canadians to see the answers Justice Rowe gave on his application form. They show his wide-ranging background – a foreign service officer (1980-84); a lawyer in private practice involved in international boundary disputes over fishing waters (1984-96); head of the civil service of Newfoundland and Labrador under a provincial Liberal government (1996-99) and judge (a federal Liberal appointee in 1999 to the province’s Supreme Court, and to the appeal court two years later).
‘There seems to be a paralysis’: Trudeau government has backlog of more than 300 appointments
(CBC) Almost 20 per cent of governor in council (GIC) appointments, which include roles with Crown corporations, port authorities, agencies and tribunals, are currently vacant or occupied by a Conservative appointee whose term is past its expiry date.
Overall, 170 GIC positions are listed as vacant. Another 116 are past their appointment’s expiry date but the incumbent has been allowed to remain in the role until he or she is either replaced or renewed.
Click here to see a complete list of vacant positions
Currently, 61 federally appointed judge positions are vacant, including one seat on the Supreme Court of Canada. (At least that was solved later in the day.)
In some cases, incumbents have been temporarily renewed only a day or two before their appointments were set to expire because the government had not yet launched the process to find a replacement.
Graham Fraser’s appointment as commissioner of official languages, which was set to expire Sunday, was extended Thursday for two months. The government has yet to issue a job posting to find his successor.
The Trudeau Report Card: A look at the bumpy road ahead
A year after a stunning majority win, the hard work of delivering more than 200 campaign promises has just begun
By John Geddes
(Maclean’s) Looking hard at the workload of Justin Trudeau’s government can be like peering into a dense thicket of promises. He made about 200 of them in last fall’s Liberal election platform. Some he’s kept and a few he’s broken, but of course most of those policy pledges remain, after only about a year in power, works in progress.
Still, the first anniversary of the Oct. 19, 2015, election is a good moment to take stock. It’s not just a matter of sorting out what’s unfolding promise by promise, although we do a good deal of that in our Trudeau report card. It’s also possible to discern a two-part theme emerging that goes a long way to defining the Trudeau government so far: the interplay between “inclusive prosperity” and “diversity.” …
Watch for the fulfilling of key promises on stepped-up infrastructure spending and some sort of innovation policy—along with whatever Dominic Barton, the global business consultant Trudeau has named as his growth guru, recommends later this fall.
So the economy looms as the biggest challenge. But a raft of hugely ambitious promises—improving the lives of Indigenous people, changing how elections are held, stepping up support for UN peacekeeping abroad—also vie for attention. Can the government maintain momentum behind so many challenging files at once?
The women and men who will influence Liberal policy in the government’s second year
Supreme Court of Canada heads into challenging fall session
A Supreme Court stocked with newcomers heads into a challenging fall session beginning on Wednesday, featuring major cases on Internet regulation, aboriginal rights and freedom of association.
The court will also tackle a high-profile criminal case in which convicted murderer Dennis Oland seeks to be released on bail while he appeals his conviction. And a case on roadside testing of drug-impaired drivers could help establish some ground rules for the coming era of marijuana legalization.
‘Go slow,’ says leader of task force on legalization of pot in Canada
McLellan said there are “important lessons” to be taken from places that have already loosened marijuana laws — chief among them to introduce change slowly.
(TorStar) “The word legalization is a big word, it’s an easy word to say, but when you start to deconstruct what that means for Canadian society as we from prohibition to legalization, the complexity of the issue I think is what has surprised me the most.”
Sunny Ways And Sunny Days May Soon Darken For Justin Trudeau
Justin Trudeau has been a public relations superstar from the very moment he took office as prime minister almost a year ago.
(HuffPost) There are several dark clouds on the horizon — and any or all could dent the Trudeau mystique:
1. The Economy– Despite all of the government’s free-wheeling (deficit) spending, the Canadian economy has been stubbornly stuck in neutral or first gear, quarter after quarter. People tend to pay less attention to this in the summer months — but they will pay more attention in the fall and they will hold the Liberals accountable. The biggest question mark? Will the force of gravity finally hit the housing sector.
2. Decisions Delayed – The PMO has deftly pushed some tough items into the future, including what to do about Canada Post; federal aid to Bombardier; and procurement of a replacement aircraft for Canada’s aging CF-18’s. Every one of these issues has the potential to make a significant number of people very unhappy and two — Canada Post and the aircraft procurement — could involve going back on (arguably ill-advised) campaign promises.
3. Washington Relations – Most Canadians fear a Trump presidency. And for good reason. The bad news is that a Hillary Clinton is far more hawkish than Obama — and far less friendly to free trade (having felt the Bern from Bernie Sanders).
4. Ministers Behaving Badly – Trudeau has already had some bad innings due to missteps on the part of cabinet members, specifically Health Minister Jane Philpott and former Fisheries Minister Hunter Tootoo. Both today could be positioned as aberrations. A couple more would be seen as a spreading ethical stain.
5. Kathleen Wynne – There’s no question the Ontario Premier helped Justin Trudeau become prime minister. And there is no question that a number of his aides and confidants have close ties to her. But the reality is that she is increasingly becoming a liability.
Ben Mulroney Interviews Justin Trudeau For Debut Episode Of CTV’s ‘Your Morning’
Mulroney also posted a photo on his social media accounts from the interview which he described as a “great chat … about issues that matter to you.” Proving the point made immediately below?
Contrast Between Photo-Op Justin And Policy Trudeau Is Night And Day
(HuffPost) It’s been 10 months, and Liberal voters are still having a difficult time seeing past the glossy veneer slathered on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. They have yet to acknowledge that their aspirational leader is anything other than the exact antithesis to their ideological enemy, Stephen Harper.
If you try initiating a discussion about Trudeau’s various positions on marijuana decriminalization, you get a whole host of responses ranging from the generic “What do you expect him to do?” to “You just don’t understand how difficult it is for him,” then back to an anti-Harper rant. It doesn’t matter that he has changed his position three times since becoming Liberal leader. In fact, never bring that up again. …
The latest reinvention is also about weapons, only this time it will be more difficult to square with the heavily promoted idea that Canada is back to its peacekeeping roots. Canada is now the second biggest arms dealer when it comes to supplying that peaceful oasis known as the Middle East with high-grade weaponry. That’s right, folks, our uber-progressive prime minister, known for his feminist bona fides and yoga poses, now leads a country where arms manufacturers thrive more than ever before.
When was the last time you heard anyone in the government talk about pipelines, arms deals, fired scientists, criminal records for pot possession, Bill C-51, the Trans-Pacific Partnership or any of the other big-ticket issues? Now, think of how easy is it to recall Trudeau marching in a parade, jogging with a world leader, joking with Obama, photobombing a wedding or the litany of other non-substantive moments in his first year as leader.
Jeffrey Simpson: Our ‘yes’ Prime Minister will one day have to say ‘no’
[Justin Trudeau] has overpromised, or at least promised an enormous number of changes. And not just incremental changes, but huge ones. It is an open question, one upon which perhaps the ultimate fate of the government will rest, whether all these promises can be fulfilled.
It’s not that the Liberals knew upon arriving in office how to give effect to their promises. They got their tax changes passed quickly, plus some other measures, then pushed the review button. No government has ever launched more studies of more policies in a shorter period of time than this one. Scarcely a week goes by – and this is not a figure of speech – that the Trudeau government doesn’t announce a new study, review or consultation.
In the past two weeks, reviews have been launched of innovation policies, university research and regulatory bodies for resource projects. The Transport Minister also said his department was reviewing internally an external policy review ordered and delivered by the previous government. Culture, defence, foreign aid, pipelines, electoral reform and legalization of marijuana are among the subjects for long-term review. Then there are the vast campaign promises on other files, such as implementing all the recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission; figuring out a national plan for climate change while also getting oil and natural gas to foreign markets… .
At some point, the government will have to say “no.” … But saying yes, being more transparent than the previous government, spending a lot of money and being led by a telegenic leader has left the Liberals in a stronger spot politically than when elected.
How Justin Trudeau is changing the rules of politics
Evan Solomon on the new political long shot
Trudeau’s great political insight is that people prefer an authentic response over a scripted one, even if it breaks a promise.
(Maclean’s) Trudeau is changing how the political game is played and putting massive poll numbers up on the board.
“We were perhaps behaving in a way that was resembling more the previous government,” Trudeau told stunned reporters as he explained that he would cede to opposition requests to more fairly distribute seats on his electoral reform committee—a sudden and surprising climbdown. Did Trudeau just compare himself to Stephen Harper? Yes, he did. This was after he’d already reversed course on the assisted-dying bill’s Motion 6, which would have limited opposition debate. And after he’d apologized—numerous times—for the infamous elbow incident. Trudeau was just doing what he has done since the campaign: breaking the five cardinal rules of political communication.
1. The flip-flop rule: Reversing decisions makes you look indecisive. Stick to your promises or people will stop trusting you.
2. The loser rule: Never repeat your negatives because you end up validating them. It goes without saying that you don’t compare yourself to the man you just defeated.
3. The blabber rule: Once you’re explaining, you’re losing. Keep messages simple.
4. The message-control rule: Never let the opposition or caucus take over the agenda. Leaders control; leaders look strong.
5. The wimp rule: Never give in to the opposition’s criticisms. Their job is to oppose. Your job is to lead.
Andrew Coyne makes some good points. In the current economic climate, sensitivities are easily aroused
Andrew Coyne: Trudeau digs a hole for himself in Davos
“My predecessor,” he began, “wanted you to know Canada for its resources. I want you to know Canadians for our resourcefulness.”
Even if resource extraction were every bit as cloddish as its critics imagine, it would still be worth doing, so long as the world was willing to pay us $100 a barrel for the stuff. Now that it’s fetching closer to $30, investors have ample signal to shift into other sectors, without the prime minister piling on. Still, for all his chatter about the need for economic “diversification,” the broad fundamentals of Canada’s economy are unlikely to change much. We are not as resource-dependent as he makes out, but neither, I suspect, will Canada be markedly more “resourceful” when he is done.
Harmless rhetoric, then? Hardly. Emotions are raw enough as it is in Alberta and Saskatchewan: witness the burst of outrage over Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre’s declaration of opposition to the Energy East pipeline. People there are feeling besieged, abandoned, even betrayed, the pipelines that would bring their oil to market held to ransom by opportunistic political leaders in the rest of Canada, while the federal government stands by. The last thing they need is their prime minister making lame puns overseas at their expense, or implying their livelihoods are infra dig.
Of course, Margaret Wente cannot resist taking aim. In Mr. Trudeau goes to Davos she reminds us that “Davos Men aren’t like the rest of us.” And bolsters her argument by citing Chrystia Freeland “[who] so memorably wrote in a famous 2011 piece in The Atlantic, they live increasingly in a world apart, “a transglobal community of peers who have more in common with” each other than with the folks back home. They live in gated communities and send their kids to private school. “The real community life of the 21st-century plutocracy occurs on the international conference circuit.”
Justin Trudeau says Davos is about attracting investment not celebrities
PM says he told actor Leonardo DiCaprio ‘enflamed rhetoric’ won’t help reach carbon reduction targets
“The people who invest billions of dollars in the global economy are gathered here this week and I’ve been spending the past few days pitching them on Canada, talking about Canadians and the extraordinary innovation, the natural resources, the diversity that makes us so strong, and encouraging them to take a closer look at Canada when they make their investment decisions because we have an awful lot to offer.”
- Trudeau, Melinda Gates and Facebook COO talk gender parity
- Leonardo DiCaprio critics highlight actor’s carbon footprint
- Hollywood star of The Revenant rips big oil in Davos
- Trudeau dines with Bono, Spacey and DiCaprio
Rex Murphy Gobsmacked By Trudeau’s Promise-Breaking ‘Magic’
(CBC) Their refugee resettlement plan, before its deadline was extended to February, was marked by experts as an ambitious undertaking. And it was a promise the government wasn’t able to keep by “a long shot,” Murphy said. “And everyone was relieved.” It’s true!
Trudeau declared a “youthful torch-bearer” at Davos
(National Observer) At home, some media may be dismissive of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s foray to Davos, Switzerland. But the international press remains agog at Canada’s leader.
The editorial board of the influential paper, The Christian Science Monitor, gave Trudeau a rousing endorsement late Thursday in an editorial titled, For a World in Gloom, a New Torch-Bearer.
The publication concluded:
“‘Trudeau was chosen as keynote speaker, says Klaus Schwab, the German economist who presides over Davos, because ‘I couldn’t imagine anybody who could represent more the world which will come out of this fourth industrial revolution.’”
Justin Trudeau’s youthful, pro-diversity pitch goes global in Davos
PM’s prowess on social media earned him fans around the world before arriving at World Economic Forum
New York Times mocked over ‘Canada is hip’ article
(BBC) In what can only be described as a back-handed compliment, the NYT declared in a recent style article that its neighbour to the north was no longer a “frozen cultural wasteland populated with hopelessly unstylish citizens”.
The reason for Canada’s sudden cultural cachet? The Times mentions film and music idols, fashion designers and YouTubers, but the star of the show seems to be new Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The “6-foot-2 self-described feminist… has assumed the role of world leader with a heart,” reckons the paper.
Trudeau makes brand Canada suddenly “hip”